Skip to main content

An Open Letter to My Favorite Periodical

Dear Esquire,

Long time reader, first time griper. Ever since opening my first copy in my childhood dentist's waiting room, I have been a firm believer that Esquire is the one, true authority for men with regards to fashion, food and foxy ladies. So much so, in fact, that I will personally thank Esquire on my tombstone. This is done in part because your magazine helped me pick out the gravesite that will attract the most single women.

Your most recent issue, however, has put me in quite the moral quandary regarding your magazine's capacity to accurately judge what constitutes "manliness."

In an article titled "10 Trends to Steal from Fashion Week," you run down the essential points that American men should take from European stylists. These include: Shortened, blue blazers, shiny tuxedos, mesh tops, and tribal print.

What the hell, Esquire? It's like you want me to get run out of town by angry villagers like I'm Frankenstein's monster or Keith Olbermann. What happened to the Esquire that mocked these highfalutin fashionistas and then insisted that the three simple keys to happiness were a three piece suit, a black turtleneck and a pair of wingtips?

Your insistance on yellow corduroy is the breaking point. Unless you're a child's teddy bear looking for a jaunty new look, that fabric is indefensible.

These suggestions have made me highly skeptical of any future opinions voiced about fashion and manliness in general. I've been thrown into a Jeremiad of alpha males and Omega watches.

Esquire used to be a paradigm of proactive ruggedness. It felt like course reading for a double major in Studliness and Virility. Now, it seems that you are trying to turn Joe Average into a Mancy boy by breeding a new generation of color blind, semi-formal troglodytes. Maybe Henry Miller was right: all the good men died in the first World War. Or at least they vanished after Fashion Week became synonymous with shore leave.

Had this been published in Men's Health, I would permit this flaw. That magazine has long since jumped the elliptical machine. But not Esquire. I hold you to a higher, studlier standard. I have always posited myself a would-be John Irving, however there were two main obstacles to this aspiration: I didn't go to Exeter and I didn't lose my virginity to an older woman. But thanks to Esquire I feel like I have accomplished both with aplomb.

Your magazine is the surrogate father I never had. You were the one that convinced me that denim on denim is a bad look unless you're Robert Redford. You were the one who taught us how to properly butcher a large mouth bass and then pan fry it in butter to impress your girlfriend. And God willing, my own son will learn how to tie a windsor knot before he can walk.

I can run down countless articles and features that have guided me to a healthier, more fulfilling life. "Which Ray Bans to wear at a funeral." The bi-monthly worship of George Clooney keeps me humble. "How to grill oysters in the summer" found a way to combine aphrodisiacs with an open flame. Your August 2007 piece, "What Your Pocket Square Says About You," should be required reading in all elementary schools along with To Kill a Mockingbird.

Which is why I am so disappointed that you're trying to turn the modern man into a limp dicked protohuman who stands out from the pack with flamboyant suspenders. That is how you get shot while hunting, Esquire.

I was set to say goodbye and go back to shopping entirely at the Gap. And then, I turned the page.

As I read through your next article, it was as though you reached inside my brain and produced a piece of print media that speaks directly to me and my unique likes and tastes. True, you went out on a limb with this ambitious new trend, but, indicative of your journalistic integrity, it was supported with numerous visual aids. I'm not sure why I doubted your grasp of what matters to ambitious, professional men. It has been reaffirmed that Esquire truly has its fingers on the pulse of what every red blooded male should be reading and believing.

I speak, of course, about your bold assertion that Kate Upton has fantastic boobs.

Continuing my subscription (both print and electronic),

Max G. Davison
Aspiring Esquire Cover Model

**********


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It was labor day weekend, I was 17. I bought a coke and some gasoline.

It's currently day three of my blogging adventure, and David Delgado has still not accepted my challenge to get off of his lazy ass and start writing. This is why a hunger strike may be necessary. If Mr. Delgado does not cave in and post a new entry by the end of this week, then on November 14th, I, Max Davison, will officially pull a Ghandi and abstain from eating for as long as it takes. Homer Simpson also utilized this tactic when the Springfield Isotopes were planning on moving to Albuquerque. It worked then, and it will work now if necessary. Onto the blogging... I had a rather pleasant dinner at the Ath tonight. It was a class dinner for Prof. Busch's GOVT20 class. The highlights included conversations about the Ivory Coast, strange roommates, and (most importantly) they had some great cheesecake. So great, in fact, that we raided the empty tables to ensure ourselves some extra slices. Cheesecake. I love it. Occasionally, I'm not sure if I want cake or a dairy

25 October 2007 - I'm not sure what his appeal is, but he deserves better

Superman has kryptonite. Mike Tyson has Buster Douglas. Vince Young has grammar. We all have our weaknesses. But mine is a little bit more embarassing than any of the aforementioned (apart from VY's hatred of the present tense): dumb romantic comedies. Yes, it's not something that I like to admit and it's a vice probably better suited for the Probie or Sean Garrity , but I just like to sit down for an hour and a half, turn my brain off and watch two people fall in love. And apart from the Hanks/Ryan classics (which were ruined for me after Meg ditched Dennis Quaid for Cinderella Man ), there is one thread that links all of my favorites: Hugh Grant. I mean, just look at the guy. When he's not getting arrested for picking up hookers on Sunset (here's a better shot of the man), he's the epitome of the 90 minute romance. He's got "endearingly befuddled" down to an art form, he's also got perfect comedic timing and if you've ever seen hi

24 September 2007 - The One Where Max Curses the Ayatollah

I've been reading up on the Middle east recently. It all started when I watched "Syriana" and was thoroughly confused. Although, watching George Clooney get tortured gave me the same sort of orgasmic bliss that I get from watching Kirk Gibson hobble around second base. Before I started studying, Ayatollah Khomeini was just that guy on the t-shirt that Homer refused to sell at his yard sale. So I have resolved to take as many Gov't classes when I get back to CMC. I'm prepared to ditch my ignorance about that giant bed of sand that happens to be floating on a sea of oil. But in my honest opinion, the greatest victim in the ongoing war between Islam and freedom has to be Yusef Islam, the artist formerly known to the world as Cat Stevens. In 1978, Cat Stevens converted to Islam and left the pop scene to focus on education and philthropy. In 1989, he called for Salman Rushdie's head on a platter, insisting He must be killed. The Koran makes it clear - if som